FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in 

Freedom of information?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    TravestonSwamp.info Forum Index -> Social & political
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
SteveB



Joined: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 241
Location: Dagun

PostPosted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 9:16 pm    Post subject: Freedom of information? Reply with quote

Here is a good article on changes to the Freedom of Information laws in Queensland in recent times.

www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,20345770-27197,00.html

This dam campaign has opened my eyes to the way the State Government and its agencies can act act to hide information from the public and manipulate its citizens by controlling the flow of information.

One thing that I have learnt, is that if you see something important on the web, hosted by the government, then download it quickly while it is there.

This even goes as far as daily transcripts of Hansard - which I had previously assumed would be a very solid record of what members had said in Parliament. It appears that Hansard transcripts can be 'edited' by members.

The FOI process now seems to be more a means of frustrating access to public documents, rather than enhancing public access.
_________________
"Bad luck ... you dickheads. Suffer in your jocks". (from: the Castle)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Pamea



Joined: 13 Jul 2006
Posts: 26
Location: Central Qld.

PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 12:24 am    Post subject: more on information difficult to access Reply with quote

Where I was looking for reference to once proposed “Comet River Dam,” near the township of Comet, situated between Blackwater & Emerald, that never eventuated after a study into the proposal. Reason then given, it was too shallow, evaporation would take the bulk of the water!

These are tributaries of the Fitzroy River System, please look at the following for more on this subject, as the Nathan Dam Proposal can not be argued as too shallow.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/features/ocean/rockhampton.htm

You could use the same argument against the travestonswamp proposal!
As the article is not dated I assume the Nathan Dam is still on the Coalitions billboard.

Surprised no one has comented on this, defeted already?
Or don't you think it is relevent?
_________________
Raised in S.E.Qld. on small mixed farm with No articulated water.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    TravestonSwamp.info Forum Index -> Social & political All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group