| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Glenda Pickersgill
Joined: 03 May 2006
Posts: 367
Location: Kandanga
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 24, 2010 4:53 am Post subject: NCR 23/9/10 Call for Mary Valley to be Qld food bowl |
 |
|
http://indymedia.org.au/2010/09/23/call-for-mary-valley-to-be-made-a-queensland-food-bowl
| Quote: | Call for Mary Valley to be made a Queensland food bowl
Thu 23 Sep 2010
By Diet Simon and Mark Rodriquez
Queensland's Labor government, one of the biggest backers of coal mining, is calling for public submissions to protect strategic cropping land now under threat from mining.
It is prioritising the fertile country of the Darling Downs around Toowoomba and the Lockyer Valley, closer to Brisbane.
But now an Independent MP, Peter Wellington, who holds the Sunshine Coast hinterland seat of Nicklin that covers Nambour, Yandina, Bli Bli, Woombye, Palmwoods and Eudlo, has sprung a surprise on the government.
He wants the Mary Valley, now largely owned by the state, also to be declared strategic farmland. Much of the valley would have been flooded by the Traveston Dam, stopped for environmental regions by the federal government in November 2009.
The Valley people are doing it tough trying to recover from their social and economic trauma and are greatly worried by the government's witholding information about what it intends to do with the land.
Most of the farmers who were forced to sell it under threat of eviction can’t afford to buy it back. Farming is seen as one of the main pursuits to rehabilitate the Valley, much of which is lying fallow and degrading to weeds.
Wellington says he hopes that when the government puts its holdings back on the market “we can make sure that that land can be used for agricultural purposes”.
He cites “scientific recognition of the good agricultural land in the Mary Valley” in the Anna Bligh government’s policy paper on protecting farmland across Queensland.
“I’m urging the government…to protect it like they’re proposing to protect the good agricultural land out from Toowoomba, protect our Mary Valley for the future,” he said in an interview with Noosa Community Radio.
“That land can be used for good agricultural purposes for a food bowl like the Lokyer and there’s no reason why it couldn’t challenge the Lokyer in the future.”
The MP wants Valley land to be “not just for dairying and grazing but really for horticulture purposes, for cropping, similar to what’s happening in the Lokyer”.
“We have a good, reliable water source in the Mary Valley and if we can ensure that the irrigation permits that originally were purchased by the government are able to return to the farmers I think that’s a great opportunity for us to create a whole new future for the Mary Valley.
“People need to make a submission by the end of September. But I believe that if people are a few days late their submissions will still be received.”
The interview can be listened to at http://www.noosacommunityradio.org/help-secure-the-mary-valley-as-a-food.... The interviewer is Mark Rodriquez.
To have your say go to the department’s website, www.derm.qld.gov.au or contact Peter Wellington on 07 5441 6933.
Noosa Com Radio badge.jpg 33.6 KB |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mulder
Joined: 01 Jul 2008
Posts: 10
Location: Mary Valley
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2010 7:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
I thought Mr Wellington was against the dam and the damage it would have done. I have read the comments posted about this article on the Indymedia website.
I must agree with them, the issues identified as part of the anti Traveston fight clearly show that there was/is limited water available for the taking from the Mary. I do not know what he is proposing should be grown in this "Food Bowl" but I would suggest that most crops would require more water than normal rain fall.
So in my opinion to be proposing this action is irresponsible, a lot of time and effort was spent in defending the Mary. Also, there were calls to "not Murray the Mary" as one comment suggested, the problem with the Murray is, it is the taking of water from it that has caused the problem and now the same is being suggested for the Mary......WHAT ARE WE THINKING? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
